Our field is commute-to-building mobility: a fair spot, a shared ride, a charged EV, idle spaces earning revenue, and an auditable ESG trail — one loop, one app. Worldwide, four companies play near this field. None of them runs the loop end-to-end.
Ask any COO, HR director, or asset manager and the same six frustrations come up. Each one alone looks small. Together they are a cost line, an employee-experience problem, and — since CSRD — a compliance obligation.
Allocation is political. Assigned spots sit empty while everyone else circles the block — and HR ends up refereeing parking disputes instead of doing HR.
Hybrid work made parking demand dynamic; static assignment can’t keep up, so capacity gets expanded before the existing spaces are optimized. A 10–20% utilization gain can delay or eliminate new parking investment — the cheap answer is using what you own.
80% of cars are single-occupancy. Carpool programs exist on paper and die in practice: matching is manual admin work and rewards are missing.
Chargers are scarce and unmanaged. Without rotation they become premium parking for the same few cars — and everyone else charges at home or not at all.
On average 30% of capacity sits idle — a 500-space garage becomes millions in non-performing capital — while the neighborhood pays for parking down the street. Dead capacity, zero revenue in an asset the owner already paid for.
CSRD and Scope-3 reporting ask for commuting emissions. In most buildings that data doesn’t exist — nothing observes how people actually get to the building.
Point tools solve one failure each. But the customer has all six — and they compound daily, in the same garage, with the same people. Yedem’s field is the loop that connects them: parking is the wedge — the system of record for the most under-optimized asset in every building — and carpooling, EV, access, and public monetization layer on top. Whoever orchestrates the commute owns the building’s mobility budget.
Fairness algorithm allocates by real usage — no politics, no dead spaces.
Rides auto-generated from commute patterns. 5 seconds: ride or drive.
Charger rotation and scheduling — chargers charge, they don’t store.
Unused spots offered to the public — nights, weekends, revenue.
CO₂ per user, occupancy, savings — CSRD / LEED / BREEAM-ready.
Why the loop matters: each module feeds the next. Sharing a ride earns a priority spot. Freed spots feed public revenue. Every trip feeds the ESG report. Single-module tools can copy a feature — they can’t copy the loop without rebuilding their product and their buyer.
No 21-dimension feature checklist. These are the questions enterprises and asset managers ask in real sales conversations — scored against the only four companies worldwide that play near our field.
| What the customer asks | ● Yedem | WayleadrIE / US | IzixBE · + Toogethr | ParkalotPL · + Poola | LiftangoAU · carpool only |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| “Will people stop fighting over spots?” Fair, transparent allocation employees trust | ✓ | ✓ | ± | ± | — |
| “Does carpooling happen without admin work?” Automatic matching from real commute patterns | ✓ | ± | — | ± | ✓ |
| “Do carpoolers get rewarded where it matters — at the gate?” Ride ↔ parking priority in one system | ✓ | ± | — | — | ± |
| “Are the chargers charging — or being parked on?” EV rotation & scheduling | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ± | — |
| “Do idle spots earn money on nights & weekends?” Public offering of unused corporate capacity | ✓ | ± | ± | — | — |
| “Can I hand the auditor a commute-emissions report?” CO₂ per user · CSRD / LEED / BREEAM-ready | ✓ | — | ± | — | ± |
| “Does it run my gates, cameras — and my whole portfolio?” Hardware integrations + asset-manager-grade multi-tenant | ✓ | ± | ✓ | — | — |
| “Is it one app for the whole commute?” Park or ride or charge or release — one login, one loop | ✓ | ± | — | — | — |
These are the only four companies a diligent investor should map against Yedem. Each is strong on its slice — and structurally unable to run the loop without rebuilding its product, its pricing, or its buyer.
Wayleadr ~$4–10M · Izix €3M · Parkalot bootstrapped (~3 people) · Liftango ~$10M+. The first consolidation move — Izix acquiring Toogethr — happened only in September 2025. This is a young, fragmented category of single-module tools, not a saturated market. The full-loop position is open, and Yedem is taking it.
Names an investor might expect in the matrix — Sharry, SKIDATA, Flash — are deliberately not there. They play adjacent fields: for Yedem they are channels, infrastructure, and integration partners, not rivals.
Per-space price comparison misleads — a $1.99 reservation tool and a mobility platform are different purchases solving different problems. What matters is what the money buys.
Yedem’s enterprise ACV is €40k average — not because we charge more per space, but because we sell more product per building: parking, carpool, EV, monetization, reporting — one logo, five modules.
The premium is funded by what the loop creates: new revenue from idle capacity and removed cost from leased spots the customer no longer needs.